Skip to main content
The Efficiency Engine helps you evaluate how effectively providers, schedules, documentation workflows, and billing processes are being used. Select it from the Report Categories dropdown in EHR Reports. It is built for executives, clinic managers, billing teams, and operations leaders who need to assess productivity, schedule utilization, code mix, documentation speed, scribe adoption, and overall provider performance. The engine contains three reports, each selected from the Key Metrics dropdown:
  • Productivity: provider working hours, visit counts, visits per hour, schedule utilization, and FTE-normalized productivity.
  • Billing Quality: procedure unit mix, evaluation complexity mix, non-billable leakage, and average codes and units per visit and per encounter.
  • Performance: composite provider performance combining patient experience, productivity, arrival, documentation, and discharged episode metrics.

Productivity

Productivity metrics combine provider working calendars, regular schedule blocks, booked appointment hours, and arrived visit counts.

How Visits / FTE is calculated

Visits / FTE = Total Visits ÷ (Clinical Hours ÷ 8) Where:
  • Total Visits: count of appointments starting in the selected date range with a status of Checked In, Completed, or Ongoing.
  • Clinical Hours: provider working hours in the date range, minus the calendar overlap of regular schedule blocks (such as a recurring lunch or admin block) with the date range.
  • ÷ 8: normalizes clinical hours to an 8-hour FTE day. A provider with 40 clinical hours in a week has 5 FTE-days.
Worked example:
  • Total visits in the period: 460
  • Clinical hours in the period: 184
  • FTE-days: 184 ÷ 8 = 23
Visits / FTE = 460 ÷ 23 ≈ 20.0, so each FTE-day saw about 20 arrived visits in that period.

Billing Quality

Billing Quality metrics are calculated from arrived appointments in the selected date range that are linked to encounters with included procedure lines. Procedure lines marked as excluded from claims are not counted, so per-visit denominators include only arrived appointments with at least one included procedure line.

Performance

Performance combines patient experience, productivity, arrival outcomes, documentation, scribe adoption, and discharged episode visit counts into a single per-provider view.

Available groupings

  • Facility: breaks results down by individual clinic or facility.
  • Provider: breaks results down by individual provider.

Example use cases

  • A regional manager comparing visits per hour and schedule utilization across providers and facilities to assess productivity.
  • A clinic manager reviewing visit mix across evaluations, follow-ups, discharges, and re-evaluations.
  • A billing lead monitoring code mix and non-billable leakage to identify documentation or coding issues.
  • A clinic manager tracking note completion time, incomplete notes, and scribe adoption to speed up billing.
  • An executive evaluating high-level provider performance using productivity, NPS, arrival rate, and episode visit metrics on the Performance report.

Behavior notes

Booked hours are not deduplicated, so Schedule Utilization % can exceed 100%. Overlapping appointments on the same provider are summed at face value: two appointments that overlap by 15 minutes each contribute their full duration. A double-booked schedule will report utilization above 100%.
  • Productivity Visits count appointments whose start time is in range, but Schedule Utilization % booked hours require appointments to start and end in range.
  • Clinical Hours subtracts the full calendar overlap of regular schedule blocks with the date range, regardless of whether the block falls inside the provider’s working hours. A 7am block on a non-working day still reduces Clinical Hours.
  • Billing Quality per-visit denominators include only arrived appointments that have at least one included procedure line connected to an encounter.
  • High Value Codes per Visit uses a code list covering the categories named in the table plus additional codes within those categories, such as 97164, 97168, 97113, and 97116. Contact support@getathelas.com if you need the full list.
  • Non Billable Leakage compares included procedure units to billable units on the latest claim submission for the encounter. It is not payer-cap-specific.
  • Performance NPS does not require the survey response to be linked to an appointment. Standalone NPS responses created in the range are included, matching the Patient Experience report.
  • Performance rolled-up metrics (NPS Score, Days to Note Completion, Scribe Adoption %, and Avg Visits per Episode) are averaged across grouped rows rather than recomputed across pooled data. Pooled and averaged values can differ when group sizes are uneven.
  • Performance rows may appear for provider and facility combinations known to the site even when a specific metric has no activity in the selected date range. Those cells will be empty or zero.